NGB karst - extended push, turned back at ~3.2km

Thread by rockfall_mk Nunavik & Hudson Bay 14 replies • 1,847 views Trip Log Photos
Post reply   Watch thread
Page 1 of 2
#1  rockfall_mk  • 

bit of a long one. stick with it if you're thinking about going up there.

me, Dani, Phil, Reeves. late september. extended push on the system from the 2022 thread, entrance in the amphibolite about 4km east of the research camp. if you missed that one we got to maybe 800m before time and weather pushed us out. nothing to report that trip, standard tight karst, some flowstone, cold, you know what it's like up there.

this time we had three days and proper logistics. plan was simple, push as far as the passage allowed and get a real survey going.

day one was fine. got to 1.1km, set a camp anchor, started the survey. the selenite situation in this system is worth mentioning even though it's probably not relevant to anything, formations throughout from the entrance, some pretty big ones by the time you're 500m in, and the acoustics are odd in the way selenite passages always are. passage trends south-southeast, drops maybe 40m over the first kilometer, consistent airflow coming toward us the whole time. all good.

day two. 2km in, nothing unusual, the selenite is much denser the deeper you go. columns floor to ceiling in some sections, proper spectacular stuff, Dani was stopping to photograph every 20m. Phil on survey. Reeves and me on point.

somewhere around 2km Reeves said the air felt off. hard to explain, not a pressure change or anything with the flow, just something about it that wasn't right. I noticed it too. we kept going.

2.4km and Dani had a headache. Phil felt sick, not badly but enough that he said something about it. Reeves and I were fine physically but I was more switched-on than the cave warranted, not anxious, just very alert in a way I couldn't account for. we've done harder passages than this.

pushed on to about 2.6km and that's when it got genuinely hard to ignore.

Dani's headache had got bad enough that she was stopping. Phil had to sit down twice and both times said his skull felt like it was vibrating, not a sound, something physical, he called it bone conduction and that's as good a description as any. Reeves went quiet and then said he had a strong feeling we shouldn't keep going. not claustrophobia, he's done a lot of tighter passages than this without issue, just this dread he couldn't explain or locate. I was still fine physically but I kept checking behind me. knew there was nothing there. kept doing it.

we talked. Dani wanted to push to 3km and reassess. Phil wanted out. Reeves didn't say much. I called it at 2.6.

next morning I went back in with Reeves, left Dani and Phil at camp. got to 3.2km. everything came back quicker this time. Reeves tapped my shoulder at about 2.8 and pointed back without saying a word and left. I did another 400m on my own before deciding that was probably not a good call.

at 3.2km there was something. hard to say if I was hearing it or feeling it, something very low frequency that I was more aware of in my chest than my ears. not a sound exactly, more like a quality the air had. passage kept going past that point. we didn't.

no survey past 2.3km, Phil wasn't in a state to run it accurately and I wasn't going to push him. the airflow at 3.2km was strong, there's a lot more cave ahead.

few things worth knowing if someone follows this up. it hits faster on re-entry, both times going back in Reeves and I got the psychological stuff quicker than the first push so theres definitely a sensitization thing happening. the physical and psychological symptoms also split across the party which is worth noting, Dani and Phil had the headache and nausea, Reeves and I got the anxiety and paranoia stuff, so its not uniform and I don't think that's just individual variation. everything resolved within a couple hours of getting out of the affected section which is good at least. multigas was running the whole time, O2 was fine, CO2 was slightly elevated at 2.4km but nowhere near levels that would explain what Phil described and it didn't spike further in. the selenite is honestly the only environmental variable that changes significantly with depth and even that I'm not sure about. the low frequency thing at 3.2 didn't show up on anything we had with us.

I'm not saying this is anything other than a cave being weird. selenite resonance is a real thing and if there's a big chamber further in it could easily be producing effects we were picking up before we had any way to detect it. that probably accounts for the physical stuff.

the dread I don't have an explanation for. if anyone does I'd like to hear it.

entrance coords and survey data to 2.3km are in the registry under NGB-K-04. not putting coords in the thread.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
#2  Speleodog  • 
Member
Posts:
441
Location:
Montréal, QC
Joined:
Feb 2016

good writeup. the variance in symptoms between party members is interesting, physical vs psychological split makes it harder to pin on a single environmental factor.

what instruments did you have for gas? asking because CO2 buildup can produce both the physical symptoms (headache, nausea) and some of the psychological ones at higher concentrations, and selenite environments can trap it. though you'd typically expect either everyone affected similarly or the physically smaller people worse, not a split like you're describing.

the bone conduction thing Phil described, did it have any directional quality? uniform through the skull or coming from a specific direction? if there's a resonance chamber ahead it might be possible to triangulate roughly.

Speleodog • Montréal • NKS 2016
#3  rockfall_mk  • 
Senior Member
NKS Member
Posts:
1,203
Location:
Val-d'Or, QC
Joined:
Apr 2011
Speleodog said:

what instruments did you have for gas?

multigas — O2, CO2, H2S, CO. all within normal range throughout. CO2 was slightly elevated at 2.4km compared to entrance but not at levels that would explain what Phil described, and it didn't trend upward as we pushed further. O2 was fine.

Speleodog said:

did it have any directional quality?

i asked Phil about this specifically. he said it felt like it was coming from ahead and below — consistent with a downward-trending passage and something large further in. he was not certain about this. his recollection of the experience was not sharp, he said it was hard to think clearly enough to observe carefully while it was happening.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
#4  karstqueen_jv  • 
Senior Member
Cave Science
Posts:
2,871
Location:
Québec City, QC
Joined:
Sep 2007

selenite resonance is real but i've never seen it produce effects at that distance from a formation unless the chamber geometry is exceptional. you're describing something affecting people 3km from the entrance and getting stronger with depth, if it's acoustic/infrasonic the source would need to be very large or very energetic.

infrasound is actually the more likely culprit for the psychological component. there's decent literature on infrasound-induced dread and paranoia, Vic Tandy's work in the 90s, a few others since. frequencies in the 18-19Hz range can produce exactly what you're describing. the bone conduction sensation could be the same source at a subharmonic.

do you know if any of you had unusual experiences in the 2-3 days after? some infrasound effects are reported to linger. also curious whether the effects were worse on second entry for anyone — if it's resonance-based you'd expect some physiological sensitization.

karstqueen_jv • QC • NKS 2007 • cave science committee
#5  rockfall_mk  • 
Senior Member
NKS Member
Posts:
1,203
Location:
Val-d'Or, QC
Joined:
Apr 2011
karstqueen_jv said:

do you know if any of you had unusual experiences in the 2-3 days after?

Dani had trouble sleeping the night after we got out. said she kept feeling like she was hearing something just below what she could actually hear, her words. gone by day two. the rest of us nothing notable.

karstqueen_jv said:

were effects worse on second entry?

yes, significantly faster onset for Reeves and i on the return push. would support the sensitization idea.

i've been reading about infrasound since we got back. the Tandy stuff is interesting. the chamber we're dealing with, if it exists and if it's the source, would have to be substantial. the airflow at 3.2km was strong enough that there's clearly significant void ahead. consistent with something large.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
#6  NorthernVoid  • 
Member
Posts:
88
Location:
Ottawa, ON
Joined:
Mar 2019

late to this thread. is the survey data to 2.3km publicly available or NKS members only? doing some work on selenite formation distribution in Shield karst and this would be useful to cross-reference.

NorthernVoid • Ottawa • NKS 2019
#7  rockfall_mk  • 
Senior Member
NKS Member
Posts:
1,203
Location:
Val-d'Or, QC
Joined:
Apr 2011

NKS members only for now — it's in the registry under NGB-K-04. if you're not a member, dues are on the homepage. standard restriction for unexplored systems, you know why.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
#8  Guest_8847  • 
New Member
Posts:
2
Location:
Joined:
May 2026

found this thread through a link and have a few questions if you don't mind.

you mentioned the bone conduction sensation felt like it was coming from ahead and below. when Phil experienced this, was it consistent throughout the affected zone or did it intensify at certain points in the passage — junctions, pinches, formation clusters? asking because infrasonic standing waves in selenite environments would have nodes and antinodes, and if the sensation tracked with passage geometry that would help narrow down whether it's a standing wave vs a continuous source.

also — the selenite formations you described. do you have any sense of their orientation? specifically whether the crystal growth was predominantly vertical, horizontal, or mixed? selenite crystals can act as resonance chambers themselves at certain aspect ratios and the orientation affects which frequencies they amplify.

and the dread and paranoia — did it feel like generalised anxiety or was there a specific directional quality to it, like a sense that something was ahead or behind rather than a diffuse feeling?

Guest_8847
#9  karstqueen_jv  • 
Senior Member
Cave Science
Posts:
2,871
Location:
Québec City, QC
Joined:
Sep 2007

those are pretty specific questions for someone who found this through a link. what's your background, Guest_8847?

karstqueen_jv • QC • NKS 2007 • cave science committee
#10  Guest_8847  • 
New Member
Posts:
2
Location:
Joined:
May 2026

acoustics and material science, some crossover into geophysics. been looking at selenite resonance properties in a research context and this description matches something i've been working on theoretically. not a caver, no intention of going there, just trying to understand what you encountered from a physics standpoint.

if the questions are too specific i understand not wanting to answer.

Guest_8847
#11  rockfall_mk  • 
Senior Member
NKS Member
Posts:
1,203
Location:
Val-d'Or, QC
Joined:
Apr 2011

fair enough. i'll answer what i can from memory.

re: bone conduction, Phil described it as consistent through the zone rather than spiking at points. if there were nodes he wasn't sensitive enough to them to notice. i personally didn't experience the physical sensation.

re: crystal orientation, mixed, predominantly vertical in the trunk passage, but the deeper formations we saw at 2-2.5km had a more complex growth pattern, some near-horizontal plates intergrown with vertical columns. unusual for selenite, suggests multiple growth phases. we didn't document it properly because Phil was running survey and wasn't stopping for photos at that point.

re: the psychological component, for me it felt directional. ahead specifically. not a sense of being followed, a sense that i shouldn't go where i was going. Reeves said something similar afterward, said it felt less like anxiety and more like a warning, though he couldn't say what it was warning him about.

i'm going to say this clearly for the thread: if your research is pointing toward something that explains what we experienced, i'd genuinely like to know. the honest answer is we don't have a good explanation for the psychological effects and it's been bothering me.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
#12  Speleodog  • 
Member
Posts:
441
Location:
Montréal, QC
Joined:
Feb 2016

Guest_8847 — if your research is relevant to this, is there anything published we could look at? not being difficult, it's just easier to evaluate if there's something to point to rather than questions going one direction.

Speleodog • Montréal • NKS 2016
#13  Guest_8847  • 
New Member
Posts:
2
Location:
Joined:
May 2026

nothing published yet. early stage work.

what you've described — the directional quality of the dread, the bone conduction ahead and below, the sensitization on re-entry, the variance between physical and psychological responders — all of it is consistent with a very large selenite resonance chamber producing infrasound in the 7-19Hz range. the psychological effects at that frequency range are documented and the physical effects are a function of body resonance, which would explain why some people felt it physically and others didn't.

what i can't explain from here is the source. a chamber that large producing that effect continuously would need either a very specific geometry to act as a resonator, or a persistent energetic input. selenite doesn't generate its own energy. whatever is driving the resonance is coming from somewhere.

thank you for answering the questions. it's been helpful.

Guest_8847
#14  karstqueen_jv  • 
Senior Member
Cave Science
Posts:
2,871
Location:
Québec City, QC
Joined:
Sep 2007

a persistent energetic input in a Hadean formation. that's a sentence.

Guest_8847 — the NGB greenstone belt is 4.28 billion years old. if you're suggesting the chamber is resonating from a geological source that's been active since the Hadean eon you're going to need to say that more plainly or it sounds like you're being cagey about something.

karstqueen_jv • QC • NKS 2007 • cave science committee
#15  Guest_8847  • 
New Member
Posts:
2
Location:
Joined:
May 2026

yes. that's what i'm suggesting.

i don't have a better answer than that right now. if i did i'd be writing it up rather than asking questions on a caving forum.

Guest_8847
#16  rockfall_mk  • 
Senior Member
NKS Member
Posts:
1,203
Location:
Val-d'Or, QC
Joined:
Apr 2011
to anyone planning to follow up on NGB-K-04: do not go past 2km without proper infrasound shielding and do not go alone. the psychological effects are not trivial. Reeves is an experienced caver and he turned back without saying a word. if you want to know why we didn't push through, that's why.

Guest_8847 hasn't posted since. if you're still reading this and your research goes somewhere, i'd like to hear about it.

rockfall_mk • NKS member since 2011 • Val-d'Or
NKS Registry contributions
Thread started • last reply • 1,847 views TopSubscribeReport
Similar threads
Thread Forum Replies Last post
NGB karst 2022 — first entrance documentation Nunavik & Hudson Bay 6 4 years ago
infrasound and dread — anyone else had this underground? Cave Science 23 3 years ago
selenite formation anomalies, Lechuguilla comparison Cave Science 8 20 months ago
physiological effects at depth — non-gas causes Safety 31 15 months ago